Phishing « IT Security Geeks

The concept of risk has been an important one for me to consider in this industry. It is important to think of risk not just as “a thing that could happen” but as how likely said thing is to actually happen. We all do this subconsciously on a daily basis, if this weren’t the case then we would be perpetually paranoid and terrified about sudden tectonic shift or meteor strikes. In reality we are blasé about these dangers since we understand that the actual risk of such an event happening is tiny. The fact that we are largely powerless to do anything about such events may also play a part in this carefree attitude.

But what about the things we can control? Most of us are smart enough to look each way before crossing a road as we understand that not checking for cars will greatly increase the risk of being hit. Auto-mobiles are a technology that we have long grown accustomed to and few are blasé about the dangers and consequences of high speed collisions. Smart phones, on the other hand, have been around for a fair few years now and it seems that most people still don’t think to check whether or not their phone’s settings are causing any photos or videos they may take to be automatically uploaded onto a “cloud” storage server. Once that happens, once potentially deeply personal files exist on two systems as opposed to one, then the risk of them being stolen by malicious hackers effectively just doubled.

When discussing the matter of personal security with peers in a social setting I have found that a lax attitude is the norm. Common phrases are “What are the odds?”, “I’m not interesting enough to be targeted” or it’s immensely frustrating cousin “I’ve got nothing to hide”. How can someone know this if they don’t know what a hypothetical attacker is looking for? As we continue to embrace more and more technology into our daily lives and entwine it so tightly with social media then, as a whole, we really need to start thinking differently on these topics.

The odds really aren’t very good for us and it does sometimes seem to me that the reason many people think that they are, is because their heads are stuck ten years in the past as far as their awareness of attack methods go. Many a person has proudly announced to me that they don’t have any viruses because they have a firewall and they don’t click on suspicious emails and they don’t go on “dodgy” pornographic websites. This underlines a worrying lack of understanding when so many believe that their traffic management system is an infallible security measure. While the occasional and incredibly obvious scam email still does the rounds there are more advanced and complex phishing methods now, especially with the “rise of the app”. And the idea that only porn sites could be potential vectors for infection is very much an old fashioned one. Just the other day Malwarebytes announced via blog post that the Mail Online site was hit by an exploit that could infect vulnerable systems with ransomware. This is a website that boasts 156 million visits per month. There are so many attacks happening, all the time, and if you never think about your tech’s security, then the chances are you’re going to get hit or that you already have been.

-JG

When something goes wrong, it is common for those affected and those responsible to play the blame game, often to place the responsibility on any doorstep but their own. Last week, as the result of Chinese app developers using a counterfeit version of Xcode now dubbed “Xcode Ghost”, a number of malware-infected apps (currently believed to be in the region of 300) made it past Apple’s vaunted review process and onto their App Store. As the dust settles and the situation is now believed to have been brought under control, many are now pointing fingers as to who or what allowed this to happen.

Some background; Xcode is Apple’s own suite of development tools for iOS and OS X, it is freely available to developers for download and use. A large number of Chinese app developers were duped into downloading and using a version of Xcode from an unverified source. This version, the afore-mentioned “Xcode Ghost”, was embedded with malicious code that could then perform a number of functions. Primarily it was found that the code could upload device and app information to a command and control server, however it was later discovered to also be capable of phishing user credentials; hijacking and opening specific URLs; reading and writing data to and from a user’s clipboard. Also, debated by some, it is believed to be capable of phishing for iCloud passwords. All quite scary stuff for the end user. But can any one party be blamed and made responsible for this?

Apple have long prided themselves on the security and quality control of their App Store. Certainly, this is the largest influx of malware infected apps ever to make it past their system of checks. It is also very difficult to protect against the unprecedented. How can you put measures in place to guard against an angle previously unconsidered? While many would say that this leaves Apple with egg on their face and a dent in their reputation, it would be hard to accuse them of neglect or carelessness.

The developers who were duped by the counterfeit Xcode Ghost must surely bear some of the brunt? Apple’s Gatekeeper software is shown to have thrown up warning flags regarding the use of the maliciously modified software, warnings that the developers would had to have deliberately ignored to proceed in using the tool for their work. This could be seen as very naive, but why was this fake version ever able to make it into their hands in the first place?

In answer to that, some point to the Chinese government’s stringent Internet restrictions, their “Great Firewall”. As a result of this, cross border downloads such as those from Apple’s official store, can take a very long time to complete. Apple software, particularly Xcode, is notorious for how long downloads can take even in Western countries. Because of this it appears that many Chinese developers chose to try and obtain Xcode from quicker, unofficial sources. This is how hackers were able to trick so many developers into downloading and utilising Xcode Ghost.

Amongst all of this there has been little discussion of who created Xcode Ghost. Who was it who set these wheels in motion, who was their target and what were they aiming to achieve? The consensus at present seems to simply be “Chinese hackers”. The basis for this assumption appears to be the fact that it was Chinese developers who were tricked into crafting the malware infected apps. The apps affected were those most popular in China, leaving them with the majority of affected users, though that is not to say that users globally were not also affected.

The truth is that there is simply not enough evidence to make any valid accusation of culprits at this point in time. What is concerning as is often the case when the blame game is played, is that too few seem to be asking the right questions. How can the stolen data be used, to what end and who benefits the most from it? With these angles considered it seems increasingly less clear that simple “criminal hackers” are behind this attack. Maybe such speculation at this stage is pointless and focus should instead be on prevention; never the less, it is our opinion that uncovering the true source and intent of Xcode Ghost would allow pre-emptive prevention, instead of just re-active measures. By keeping a close eye on further developments and seeing how any stolen data gets used, we may yet get some clues as to the purpose and origin of this attack on China.

So today we received the following phish at one of our honeypot e-mail addresses.

As you can see, it looks legitimate, however the URL doesn’t resolve to linkedin.com, it resolves to http://hungryhorsechapel.com/removed/for/obvious/reasons.php

It appears Hungry Horse Chapel have been compromised, IT Security Geeks have reached out to the teams at Horse Chappel and LinkedIn, and are hoping to hear back soon. We will post updates here as and when we have them.